A brand sells a product at £29.99 in the UK. The same product sells at €24.99 in Germany. At current exchange rates, that is a meaningful price gap. An entrepreneurial seller notices, buys stock through a German distributor, and lists it on Amazon UK for £26.99. The UK brand is undersold in its own market by its own product. No rules broken. No counterfeit involved. Just arbitrage.
This is cross-border leakage. It is one of the least visible pricing threats brands face, and one of the most structurally difficult to resolve.
Why it is getting more common
Two things have made cross-border leakage significantly easier in recent years. The first is the infrastructure. Amazon Global, eBay's cross-border trade programme, and the maturation of pan-European FBA mean a seller can source in one country and sell in another with minimal friction. The second is information. Price gaps across markets are now visible to anyone willing to look. The arbitrage opportunity is obvious.
European brands are particularly exposed. The EU single market allows goods to move freely between member states. A German distributor selling excess stock to a Polish trading company that lists on Amazon UK is not, in most interpretations, doing anything illegal. The product is genuine. The movement is legal. The damage to the brand's UK pricing strategy is real.
Cross-border ecommerce in Europe reached €358 billion in 2024, with 70% of volume flowing through marketplaces. The infrastructure that enables legitimate international trade also enables pricing arbitrage at scale.
What it looks like from the inside
The typical sequence runs like this. A brand sells through authorised distributors in multiple European markets, each with agreed pricing and territory restrictions. One distributor, dealing with slow-moving stock, a warehouse capacity issue, or a cash flow pressure, sells surplus inventory to a third party. That third party is not bound by any territorial agreements. They list wherever the margin is best.
The brand's first signal is usually a competitor alert or a pricing anomaly on Amazon. By then, the stock has already been sold and listed. The distributor may not even know where it went. Proving the source of the leak is a significant investigative exercise.
The Buy Box connection
Cross-border leakage does not stay in the margins. It connects directly to Buy Box stability. When a cross-border seller lists at a lower price on your product, Amazon registers the price discrepancy. Your Buy Box becomes contested. In some cases, Amazon matches the lower price and comes back to you for margin funding. In others, the Buy Box is suppressed until pricing normalises.
The result is that a distribution problem in one market becomes a visibility and revenue problem in another, often without any direct connection visible to the people managing each market independently.
What good management looks like
Brands that handle cross-border leakage well share a few characteristics. They have granular visibility across markets, they can see, daily, which sellers are active on which ASINs in which countries, and at what prices. They track seller identity across markets, so a seller appearing in the UK can be connected to activity in Germany. And they have structural controls in distribution agreements, sell-through reporting, inventory traceability, and clear consequences for unauthorised resale.
The monitoring piece is foundational. You cannot enforce agreements you cannot verify. And you cannot verify compliance across multiple markets without systematic, daily data at the seller level.
Cross-border leakage is, ultimately, a data problem before it is a legal one. The brands that resolve it fastest are the ones that see it earliest.
See what Lupa can find on your brand.
We will put together a sample report showing who is selling your products, at what price, and what impact it is having on your channel.
Request a sample report